Defending Christian Leadership for Christian Groups | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

By David French1327095613000

This week the ACLJ filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court in support of a cert petition filed by a Christian fraternity and a Christian sorority asking that the Court grant them the right to exist at San Diego State University. The University de-recognized the groups because they “discriminate” on the basis of religion.

Well, of course they do. They’re religious organizations, after all. As the Supreme Court just reaffirmed in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC, religious groups have a vital First Amendment interest in ensuring that their leaders share the group’s faith and purpose.

In the case at San Diego State (Alpha Delta Chi-Delta Chapter v. Reed), the university actually stipulated that it allows some other student groups (for example, political or ideological groups) to restrict membership or leadership to those individuals who agree with the “ideology, belief, or philosophy the group seeks to promote.” In other words, while the College Democrats can be for Democrats only or College Republicans can be for Republicans only, a Christian group has to be open to atheist leadership.

Simply put, this makes no sense.

In our amicus brief – filed with InterVarsity Christian Fellowship – we ask the Court to consider not only the injustice of the policy at issue but also the ongoing attack against religious expression on campus. There is great need for the same free expression principles outlined in Hosanna-Tabor to be applied to religious student groups at our colleges and universities.

Latest in
Supreme Court

Lasting Legacy of the Federal Judiciary

By Edward White1470941293585

One of the powers the President of the United States has is to appoint federal judges with the advice and consent of the Senate. Presidents generally appoint judges who share the President’s philosophy about how the law should be interpreted and cases decided. Through appointments, a President...

read more

How You Can Impact Supreme Court Battle

By Nathanael Bennett1459957895352

The fight over the nomination to replace Justice Scalia is well underway, and will likely intensify through the summer. President Obama, Senate Democrats, and their allies have promised as much. Here’s where we are: U.S. Senate leadership has promised not to confirm or hold hearings on any nominee...

read more

Let the People Have a Voice

By Jay Sekulow1458143127132

The U.S. Senate should not take any action on President Obama’s nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia until after the presidential election. We are in the middle of a critical election and it’s important that Americans have a voice in filling the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court. We continue...

read more

Sen. Grassley Stands on Principle

By Jay Sekulow1457642013868

The Quad-City Times' recent editorial “Grassley's SCOTUS gamble could backfire” misses the mark. Sen. Chuck Grassley understands the importance of championing the voice of the American people in selecting the next Supreme Court Justice. As chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, his decision to...

read more