We’ve detected that you’re using Internet Explorer. Please consider updating to a more modern browser to ensure the best user experience on our website.

Graduation Conflict Over Mention of God

By 

Jay Sekulow

June 21, 2011

2 min read

Religious Liberty

A

A

 

Its that time of year again and at the ACLJ, we are working to resolve a graduation issue that has us concerned.   School officials in one California school district want to censor a student because of the mention of God.

 

We were contacted by the parent of an 8th grade student who auditioned to perform a tap dance number at her graduation ceremony that will take place in a few weeks. The graduation committee was impressed by her dance and invited her to perform at the ceremony, but they told her that she had to change her song selection or use an instrumental version with no words. The reason?  The song mentions God.

 

Were working to resolve this matter on behalf of the student.  Its important to point out that students do not lose their freedom of speech at graduation ceremonies.  The same principles apply to this situation as to religious content within speeches given by valedictorians and salutatorians. Guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Education in 2003 state that, Where students or other private graduation speakers are selected on the basis of genuinely neutral, evenhanded criteria and retain primary control over the content of their expression, . . . that expression is not attributable to the school and therefore may not be restricted because of its religious (or anti-religious) content.

 

While the Guidelines declare that a school may make appropriate, neutral disclaimers to clarify that such speech (whether religious or nonreligious) is the speakers and not the schools schools cannot simply ban any and all references to God in student expression at graduations. Student artistic performances and speeches should be reasonably understood as the students own expression rather than speech endorsed by the school.  Students should be able to share how their faith has impacted their lives without fear of censorship by school officials. Such student expression is clearly distinguishable from the kind of school-endorsed official prayer struck down in Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992).

 

Well keep you posted on this issue as it unfolds.

 

 

close player