Search  |  Login  |  Register

Devastating Failures in Libya

By Nathanael Bennett1349995971000

It was a sober and embarrassing day for the State Department at yesterday’s hearing in front of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee. In the course of just a few hours, the hearing revealed numerous astonishing facts surrounding the tragic terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. First, the hearing provided hard evidence that repeated requests for additional security had been rejected by the State Department. The Committee heard testimony from Eric Nordstrom, who was the Regional Security Officer in charge of security on the ground at the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, and Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, who led a 16-member special forces team that was pulled from Libya a month before the attack. Both testified to having been acutely aware of serious threats to the Embassy, and to having repeatedly requested increased security personnel from the State Department. Those requests were denied.

The Committee also heard testimony from D.C.-based State Department officials, including Deputy Assistant Secretary Charlene Lamb and Undersecretary for Management, Ambassador Patrick Kennedy. Ms. Lamb, in response to questioning from the Committee, confirmed the decision to deny additional security personnel. Perhaps the most devastating testimony was given by Officer Nordstrom, who said that the most frustrating thing about his assignment was “dealing and fighting against the people, programs and personnel who are supposed to be supporting me.” He concluded: “For me, the Taliban is on the inside of the building.”

The other significant development from the hearing was testimony that there was never any reason to attribute the attack to a protest of an internet video. In fact, all evidence pointed clearly to a calculated, organized and methodical attack. In addition to reports that the streets around the Embassy were quiet before the attack, Lt. Col. Wood testified that it was “instantly recognizable” to him as a terrorist attack and that he “almost expected the attack to come.” He said “we were the last flag flying…it was only a matter of time.” And yet, it was a full eight days before the State Department reversed the message that had been voiced by Ambassador Rice, Secretary Clinton and President Obama that it was a YouTube video that motivated the attack.

In closing, Chairman Issa indicated a desire to question Ambassador Rice, as well as a desire to hold a classified hearing to obtain additional information. But much is already clear. An Ambassador and three other Americans were murdered. Their deaths were preceded by unheeded requests for additional security. Their deaths were followed by eight days of story-telling by the Administration.

The families of the slain deserve the truth about why the Embassy in Benghazi was vulnerable. Fortunately, yesterday’s hearing yielded numerous answers. Unfortunately, most of those answers are extremely disturbing and raise additional questions that demand honest answers from the State Department.

Latest in
Jihad

Revoke Citizenship of Terrorists

By Jay Sekulow1421250209569

Last week, France faced the threat that is arguably the toughest to defeat—a threat from within, from its own terrorists. By now, the stories are familiar. France has a problem with homegrown radicals. At least 900 French citizens are among the 2,000 to 3,000 westerners who’ve left home for...

read more

Boko Haram Murders 2,000 More

By Matthew Clark1421182058630

As the world has watched the horrific terrorist attacks in Paris, France last week, as radical Islamic jihadists murdered over a dozen innocent civilians and struck at the very heart of freedom, another terrorist group carried out what is being called the “ second-deadliest terrorist attack in...

read more

The Pyramid of Support for Jihad

By David French1421101789922

As an Evangelical conservative, I can’t say that a militant, condescending atheist like Bill Maher is my favorite comedian or my favorite pundit, but when a man’s right, he’s right. His statement last week that “Hundreds of millions of them support an attack like this. They applaud an attack like...

read more

When Barbarism Is Propaganda

By David French1420653566312

The civilized world is confronting a movement that defines “victory” as the slaughter of unarmed cartoonists at work at their desks. Even worse, that movement knows that its barbarism — the very conduct that revolts us — is perhaps the jihadists’ most effective recruiting tool. Jihadist snuff films...

read more