Pittsburgh Poised to Repeal Ordinance Banning Pro-Life Leaflets | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1311345802000

I wanted to bring you an update on a case that we've been involved in since last year - a case that has significant ramifications for the First Amendment.

As you may recall, we secured an important victory in federal court last fall against the City of Pittsburgh. The issue: an ordinance that violated the constitutional rights of pro-life advocates.

It all began last fall when we filed a federal lawsuit challenging Pittsburgh Ordinance 601.02, which prohibited the distribution of leaflets in the City. Our clients wanted to distribute pro-life leaflets - in the days leading up to the November election - on unoccupied parked cars without fear of fine, penalty or censure.

Our lawsuit was clear: the ordinance was unconstitutional. It was overbroad, vague and impinged on the rights of free speech and due process that the United States Constitution guarantees.

The court acted quickly. It granted our request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) in October, clearing the way for our clients to distribute the materials before the November election. U.S. District Judge David S. Cercone found that our arguments demonstrated "a likelihood of success on the merits" and enjoined the City from enforcing the ordinance. In February, Judge Cercone issued an order granting our motion for a preliminary injunction, explaining that the City's desire to control littering by barring the distribution of the leaflets did not outweigh the constitutional rights of our clients.

In recent months, we have focused on efforts to permanently resolve this case. And, now the City of Pittsburgh is moving forward to remove this troubling ordinance, which was adopted in 2008. The City already has agreed to pay $35,000 in attorneys' fees to settle the suit and is moving forward with legislation in City Council to repeal it.

In an editorial entitled - "Speech is speech: Pittsburgh must remove an offensive ban" - the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette concluded:

"The purpose of the 2008 ordinance was to restrict leafleting in the interests of curbing littering. In a city where litter is a problem, especially Downtown, the ordinance made some superficial sense. But what seems a potential source of litter to one person is free speech to another -- and that right isn't superficial, it's fundamental." As the Post-Gazette put it: "It doesn't matter whether the speech takes a position that is pro-life or pro-choice - it's all protected."

I will keep you posted on when this problematic ordinance is taken off the books in the City of Pittsburgh.

Latest in
Pro Life

Truth About Abortionists Shown

By CeCe Heil1454954098817

NARAL and Planned Parenthood promote a culture of death. There is only one problem. In order to keep their racket going, the public must not believe that an unborn baby is human. This deception is critical to their success. They seemed to be rather successful in the past, referring to the baby as a...

read more

Commercial Makes Big Abortion Go Crazy

By Matthew Clark1454951472929

Last night’s Doritos Super Bowl commercial has the abortion industry absolutely losing its mind. Why? The commercial shows a baby in an ultrasound. Take a look: NARAL – the abortion industry’s top lobbyists – immediately took to Twitter in outrage, fuming, “#NotBuyingIt - that @Doritos ad using...

read more

Pro-Abortion Messages Demean Women

By Palmer Williams1454710075910

Pro-abortion forces continue to bombard us with rhetoric that is profoundly dehumanizing to women, babies, and their opponents. This week alone, Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards has gone on the record calling babies a “ devastating consequence ” and suggesting that pro-life members of...

read more

Abortion Safety Myth Punctured

By Walter M. Weber1454443439164

Have you heard the myth that abortion is safer than childbirth? Did you ever stop to think whether it makes sense to claim that an interruption of a natural process, using metal instruments, poisonous drugs, and/or powerful suction machines is somehow good for a person's health? On March 2, the...

read more