Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1308883538000

Time is of the essence.

A troubling new law that unconstitutionally targets crisis pregnancy centers in New York City is scheduled to be enacted on July 14th.

That's why today's hearing on our motion for a preliminary injunction asking a federal court to block it was so important.

As you recall, we filed a federal lawsuit in March against the City of New York, challenging the constitutionality of the new ordinance.

Here's the problem:

The ordinance requires crisis pregnancy centers to post signs in the lobbies of their counseling centers, add extensive additional written language to their advertising materials, and to provide oral statements during both "in person" and telephonic conversations regarding the services offered by crisis pregnancy centers.

This ordinance violates the constitutional rights of our clients and forces crisis pregnancy centers to adopt and express views about abortion and contraception that are not their own, that they strongly disagree with.

At a hearing today before Judge William H. Pauley in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, our attorneys argued that the new law violates the constitutional rights - including freedom of speech - of the crisis pregnancy centers.  We also asserted that the law forces the centers to espouse a message they disagree with and interferes with their right to craft a message of their own choosing.      

We pointed out to the court that this disturbing law violates the constitutionally protected rights to freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, freedom of the press, and due process of law, guaranteed to Plaintiffs by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the New York Constitution.

In this case, we represent The Evergreen Association (Expectant Mother Care Pregnancy Centers-EMC Frontline Pregnancy Centers) and Life Center of New York (AAA Pregnancy Problems Center) which operate a total of 13 crisis pregnancy centers across New York City.

Clearly, with the law set to take effect July 14th, we're expecting a decision soon from the court regarding our motion for a preliminary injunction.

It's our hope that the court will take the appropriate action and put an end to this measure before it ever takes effect.

 

Latest in
Pro Life

Please, Don’t Throw Life Away

By Nicole Smith1429736189878

Just four short weeks from now I’ll be meeting my little daughter for the first time. I can only imagine the rush of emotions that will ensue as I hold her in my arms for the first time. But, one thing I know right now, that moment will mark a very significant turning point in my life. No longer...

read more

Holding Planned Parenthood Accountable

By Walter M. Weber1429567200000

Washington, D.C. – The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) today filed a reply brief in support of the ACLJ’s request that the Supreme Court review our False Claims Act (FCA) case against Planned Parenthood. The matter will now be submitted to the Court for action, potentially as early as...

read more

Planned Parenthood’s Founder

By Edward White1429534800000

Most right-minded people look at children as gifts from God. Not Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. She did not like children. In her book, Women and the New Race , Sanger expressed her disgust toward large families, rich and poor, viewing them as harmful to society: “The immorality of...

read more

Planned Parenthood's Propaganda

By Olivia Summers1429130831459

On March 10, 2015, Planned Parenthood posted its most recent attempt to normalize murder and deflect attention from the real issue of abortion—that it kills. “What is abortion stigma?” is a four minute video produced by Planned Parenthood and SeaChange. The video’s stated purpose is to “transform...

read more