Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Matthew Clark1328971750000

Nothing.

In reaction to the outcry of the American people over the Obama Administration’s decision to force religious institutions to violate their religious beliefs by providing insurance coverage for abortion pills for their employees, President Obama unveiled an “accommodation” that was anything but.

President Obama began by calling the religious liberty objections raised by many Americans, the “cynical desire on the part of some to make this into a political football.”

Here is the essence of Obama’s “compromise.” Instead of requiring religious institutions to violate their faith by directly paying for abortion pill coverage in their employer health insurance plans, it requires religious institutions to purchase insurance coverage that carries with it a mandate to cover contraception and abortion-causing drugs.

As Congressman Chris Smith astutely noted, “Who pays for the insurance policy? The religious employer.”

Here is how President Obama explained it, “The result will be that religious organizations won't have to pay for these services and no religious institution will have to provide these services directly.” Directly? That’s the compromise. Religious organizations will no longer be required to violate their faith directly . . . just indirectly.

As Jay Sekulow, ACLJ Chief Counsel, told the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) today, “There is no compromise with free exercise of religion.” President Obama is still telling religious institutions that in order “to operate, you must violate your conscience.”

Whether it is direct or indirect, the Constitution protects citizens from being forced to choose between violating their deeply held religious beliefs and violating the law.

2.11.2012 Update: The Wall Street Journal conducted an excellent economic analysis of President Obama’s “accommodation,” concluding that “as with all mandated benefits, . . . these costs will be borne eventually via higher premiums” and that the result is that religious institutions “will still pay for birth control, even if it is nominally carried by a third-party corporation.”

Thousands of American’s have spoken out against the Obama Administration’s assault on religious liberty. You can join the ACLJ in fighting back by signing the “Petition to Reverse Obama's Forced Abortion Pill Coverage for Religious Institutions.

Latest in
ObamaCare

ACLJ Opposes New HHS Mandate Regs

By Geoffrey Surtees1413905016065

Today, the American Center for Law & Justice filed formal comments in objection to the administration’s latest efforts to see to it that both non-profit and for-profit groups continue to kowtow to the HHS Mandate. (The HHS Mandate, adopted pursuant to Obamacare, is that collection of rules and...

read more

Efforts Against Abortion Pill Mandate

By Edward White1412607468142

Litigation generally takes a long time before a case is finally resolved. Despite the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision this past summer, ruling that the HHS Mandate violates the religious exercise rights of for-profit businesses and their owners who oppose having to pay for abortion pill...

read more

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more