Search  |  Login  |  Register

SCOTUS’s Next Steps in Obamacare

By Edward White1333032849000

The Supreme Court spent more than six hours over the past three days hearing oral arguments on the four issues involved in the ObamaCare case. You can read my posts on these issues here, regarding the Anti-Injunction Act, here, regarding the individual mandate, and here, regarding severability and the expansion of Medicaid.

Now that oral argument has concluded, what does the Supreme Court do next in the ObamaCare case?

The nine Justices will meet in a private conference this Friday to discuss and vote on the four issues. The Justices will vote in order of seniority, with Chief Justice Roberts (who, based on his position, is considered the most senior Justice) voting first, then Justice Scalia, and so on until the most junior Justice, Justice Kagan, votes. The vote, which is preliminary and non-binding, is necessary to determine whether there are at least five Justices (a majority) who agree on the various issues.

If Chief Justice Roberts is in the majority, he assigns the writing of the majority opinion to one of the Justices, including himself, who is in the majority. If Chief Justice Roberts is not in the majority, then whoever is the most senior Justice in the majority assigns the majority opinion, which again can be assigned to that same Justice.

Over the coming weeks, the Justices, with the assistance of their law clerks, will research and draft the various opinions that will comprise the decision of the Court, that is, the majority opinion, any concurring opinion(s), and any dissenting opinion(s). A concurring opinion is generally one in which a Justice(s) agrees with the outcome reached by the majority, but for a different reason. A dissenting opinion is one in which a Justice(s) disagrees with the outcome reached by the majority. Occasionally, no opinion is joined by at least five Justices, in which case the opinion with the most votes is called a plurality opinion.

Drafts of the various opinions will be circulated among the nine Justices. In reviewing the drafts, a Justice may change his or her mind and decide to vote differently from how he or she preliminarily voted at the private conference, referenced previously. The public is not made aware of any vote changes, just as the public is not made aware of the preliminary voting.

Once the Justices have solidified their votes, the Court will issue its written decision. This can occur anytime between now and the end of June. Only when we get the Court’s written decision will we know the outcome of the four issues involved in ObamaCare. Until then, all we can do is speculate.

Latest in
ObamaCare

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more

Massive Blow to ObamaCare

By David French1406047849000

It looks like Nancy Pelosi should have read ObamaCare before she passed it. This morning, in a 2-1 decision the D.C. Circuit struck down a lawless IRS rule that dramatically extended ObamaCare subsidies well beyond the law’s written guidelines. Put simply, the D.C. Circuit found that ObamaCare...

read more

New Abortion-Pill Mandate Voted Down

By Matthew Clark1405542977000

Senate Democrats attempt to gut religious liberty and “reverse” the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision on the abortion-pill mandate has been defeated. Pro-abortion radicals reeling from the Supreme Court’s decision in Hobby Lobby quickly jumped to extreme measures to push through their failing...

read more