Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1333052556000

The political posturing began long before the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the constitutionality of ObamaCare. But, now with arguments concluded, the political posturing is being ratcheted up.

While a new poll suggests most Americans expect the high court to overturn the pro-abortion, government-run health care law, the fact is this will be a very close case.

What's both interesting and troubling is the fact that some on the Left are attempting to put the Supreme Court itself 'on trial' for ObamaCare. At least one liberal group contends if the Justices reject ObamaCare including the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance under penalty of law, this will play into the hands of President Obama's re-election campaign which would use this loss as a rallying point to challenge an activist judiciary.

The truth is ObamaCare is not unique when it comes to controversial constitutional issues that are decided by the nine Justices. It is certainly more high-profile than most, with ramifications that truly affect every American. But this is exactly what our high court was created to do. Tackle the tough issues. Sort out the constitutional consequences. Make a decision.

In a discussion today on FOX News, I made it clear that most Americans understand that if President Obama's landmark measure is scrapped by the high court, and many believe it could be, the outcome of this case underscores exactly what our Founders intended - an independent judiciary doing what it is supposed to do. You can watch the interview here.

Don't get me wrong. There's going to be plenty of discussion in this presidential campaign about judges and the judiciary. And, there should be. But that needs to focus on the type of judicial nominees the candidates will put forth - nominees who either uphold the Constitution and the rule of law, or nominees who see the Constitution as a changing document open to interpretation.

We will get the Supreme Court decision on ObamaCare at the end of the term - likely at the end of June. It will be significant and sweeping no matter what the Court ultimately determines.

 

Latest in
ObamaCare

Efforts Against Abortion Pill Mandate

By Edward White1412607468142

Litigation generally takes a long time before a case is finally resolved. Despite the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision this past summer, ruling that the HHS Mandate violates the religious exercise rights of for-profit businesses and their owners who oppose having to pay for abortion pill...

read more

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more

Massive Blow to ObamaCare

By David French1406047849000

It looks like Nancy Pelosi should have read ObamaCare before she passed it. This morning, in a 2-1 decision the D.C. Circuit struck down a lawless IRS rule that dramatically extended ObamaCare subsidies well beyond the law’s written guidelines. Put simply, the D.C. Circuit found that ObamaCare...

read more