It was an extraordinary exchange. Rep. Trey Gowdy, (R-SC) asking Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sebelius to explain the constitutional implications involved in the HHS mandate, which is under attack for violating the religious beliefs of millions of Americans. The mandate requires employers to purchase health insurance for their employees that includes coverage for contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs.
We filed a federal lawsuit challenging this mandate in March on behalf of a Missouri business owner.
And, we first reported on this startling exchange between Rep. Gowdy and Secretary Sebelius in a blog post yesterday.
Today, on FOX News, I told Megyn Kelly this exchange was entirely appropriate and illuminated important information about this mandate. What is clear and very troubling is that Secretary Sebelius was totally unfamiliar with the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding religious freedom. Further, she relied on no legal memorandum in putting the mandate together, and didn't seek advice of the Justice Department regarding the legality of the mandate.
It's difficult to believe that Secretary Sebelius was clueless when it came to the Constitution and to the religious liberty protections guaranteed to Americans by the First Amendment. You can watch the FOX interview here.
The exchange between Rep. Gowdy and Secretary Sebelius was quite remarkable. You can watch it here.
Clearly, no one expects the HHS Secretary to be a constitutional scholar. But is it too much to ask that she turn to legal experts when it comes to crafting and implementing a mandate that tramples on the First Amendment protections afforded Americans?
As we approach the one year anniversary of the Hobby Lobby decision , where the Supreme Court held that the HHS Mandate violated the religious liberties of business owners, it’s clear that the struggle to vindicate religious freedom and the right to conscience is far from over. Having said that,
Today the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could cripple ObamaCare. The Supreme Court has a critical opportunity to reject IRS regulations that illegally authorize tax subsidies for purchasers of health insurance on federal healthcare exchanges. The ACLJ has filed an amicus...
After his “glib” apology before Congress this week for calling the American people “stupid,” ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber attempted to dodge, duck, dip, dive, and … dodge every substantive question that came his way. He refused to answer even the simplest questions like how much ( millions )
From day one, we have warned that the real danger of Obamacare is not in the 2,700 pages of its text (as bad as they are), but in the hundreds of thousands of pages of rules and regulations that would flow out of that text. This week provides yet another example of that danger, and it is in the...