Constitutional Questions Plague HHS Secretary | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1335915707000

It was an extraordinary exchange. Rep. Trey Gowdy, (R-SC) asking Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sebelius to explain the constitutional implications involved in the HHS mandate, which is under attack for violating the religious beliefs of millions of Americans. The mandate requires employers to purchase health insurance for their employees that includes coverage for contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs.
We filed a federal lawsuit challenging this mandate in March on behalf of a Missouri business owner.
And, we first reported on this startling exchange between Rep. Gowdy and Secretary Sebelius in a blog post yesterday.

Today, on FOX News, I told Megyn Kelly this exchange was entirely appropriate and illuminated important information about this mandate. What is clear and very troubling is that Secretary Sebelius was totally unfamiliar with the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding religious freedom. Further, she relied on no legal memorandum in putting the mandate together, and didn't seek advice of the Justice Department regarding the legality of the mandate.
It's difficult to believe that Secretary Sebelius was clueless when it came to the Constitution and to the religious liberty protections guaranteed to Americans by the First Amendment. You can watch the FOX interview here.

The exchange between Rep. Gowdy and Secretary Sebelius was quite remarkable. You can watch it here

Clearly, no one expects the HHS Secretary to be a constitutional scholar. But is it too much to ask that she turn to legal experts when it comes to crafting and implementing a mandate that tramples on the First Amendment protections afforded Americans? 
Jay Sekulow


Latest in

HHS Mandate Challenges Move Forward

By Geoffrey Surtees1442515755574

Thanks to two decisions of a federal court of appeals handed down today ( here and here ), it is now almost certain that the U.S. Supreme Court will decide next term whether the Obama administration can force religious entities, institutions, and groups -- under pain of severe financial penalties...

read more

Helping Little Sisters of the Poor

By Geoffrey Surtees1440436960697

Just over one year ago, the Supreme Court held in the Hobby Lobby decision that the HHS Mandate, a federal regulation requiring non-exempt employers to provide abortion-inducing drugs and services to its employees, violated the religious rights of closely held corporations and their owners. It was...

read more

Though Flawed, ObamaCare Stands

By Michelle Terry1435602214218

About a month ago, we discussed five critical failures of the Affordable Care Act, otherwise known as ObamaCare. Unfortunately, we now know that the highest Court in the land has determined – again – that this law will stand, despite its many flaws. Last Thursday, the Supreme Court of the United...

read more

Supreme Court Again Rewrites ObamaCare

By Jay Sekulow1435247432884

It’s a troubling and disappointing decision by the Supreme Court. Today’s 6-3 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court backing the Obama Administration’s health care law – granting taxpayer subsidies not authorized by Congress in order to save the flawed law – did not interpret the law. The majority...

read more