Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1335915707000

It was an extraordinary exchange. Rep. Trey Gowdy, (R-SC) asking Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sebelius to explain the constitutional implications involved in the HHS mandate, which is under attack for violating the religious beliefs of millions of Americans. The mandate requires employers to purchase health insurance for their employees that includes coverage for contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs.
 
We filed a federal lawsuit challenging this mandate in March on behalf of a Missouri business owner.
 
And, we first reported on this startling exchange between Rep. Gowdy and Secretary Sebelius in a blog post yesterday.

Today, on FOX News, I told Megyn Kelly this exchange was entirely appropriate and illuminated important information about this mandate. What is clear and very troubling is that Secretary Sebelius was totally unfamiliar with the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding religious freedom. Further, she relied on no legal memorandum in putting the mandate together, and didn't seek advice of the Justice Department regarding the legality of the mandate.
 
It's difficult to believe that Secretary Sebelius was clueless when it came to the Constitution and to the religious liberty protections guaranteed to Americans by the First Amendment. You can watch the FOX interview here.

The exchange between Rep. Gowdy and Secretary Sebelius was quite remarkable. You can watch it here

Clearly, no one expects the HHS Secretary to be a constitutional scholar. But is it too much to ask that she turn to legal experts when it comes to crafting and implementing a mandate that tramples on the First Amendment protections afforded Americans? 
 
Jay Sekulow

 

Latest in
ObamaCare

ACLJ Opposes New HHS Mandate Regs

By Geoffrey Surtees1413905016065

Today, the American Center for Law & Justice filed formal comments in objection to the administration’s latest efforts to see to it that both non-profit and for-profit groups continue to kowtow to the HHS Mandate. (The HHS Mandate, adopted pursuant to Obamacare, is that collection of rules and...

read more

Efforts Against Abortion Pill Mandate

By Edward White1412607468142

Litigation generally takes a long time before a case is finally resolved. Despite the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision this past summer, ruling that the HHS Mandate violates the religious exercise rights of for-profit businesses and their owners who oppose having to pay for abortion pill...

read more

Obama Repackages Abortion-Pill Mandate

By Matthew Clark1408738939000

The Obama Administration is not one to let a mere Supreme Court decision get in the way of its radical pro-abortion agenda. After losing major abortion-pill mandate litigation at the Supreme Court and then failing in an attempt to ram a new abortion-pill mandate through Congress (where it couldn’t...

read more

Another Win in HHS Mandate Litigation

By Edward White1407812800000

Over the past few years, the ACLJ has represented numerous businesses and their owners in seven lawsuits challenging the HHS Mandate, which requires businesses to include in their health plans coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortion-inducing drugs in order to avoid crippling...

read more