Today, twelve lawsuits were filed in federal courts around the country challenging the HHS mandate requiring health insurance plans to include coverage of abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception. Bringing the lawsuits are forty-three dioceses, hospitals, schools, and other Catholic charities.
To describe this as a legal tidal wave would be an understatement.
The extraordinary number of lawsuits and plaintiffs over one federal regulation, including a suit filed by the ACLJ in March of this year, is not surprising. The regulation in question, the HHS mandate, is an outrageous and sweeping assault by President Obama and his Administration on the religious and moral beliefs of religious institutions and private business owners.
One of the plaintiffs in this series of lawsuits is the University of Notre Dame, which, three years ago, invited President Obama to speak at its graduation exercises. Notre Dame says this in its complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana:
This lawsuit is about one of America’s most cherished freedoms: the freedom to practice one’s religion without government interference. It is not about whether people have a right to abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception. Those services are, and will continue to be, freely available in the United States, and nothing prevents the Government itself from making them more widely available. But the right to such services does not authorize the Government to force the University of Notre Dame (“Notre Dame”) to violate its own conscience by making it provide, pay for, and/or facilitate those services to others, contrary to its sincerely held religious beliefs.…
If the Government can force religious institutions to violate their beliefs in such a manner, there is no apparent limit to the Government’s power. Such an oppression of religious freedom violates Notre Dame’s clearly established constitutional and statutory rights.
The First Amendment also prohibits the Government from becoming excessively entangled in religious affairs and from interfering with a religious institution’s internal decisions concerning the organization’s religious structure, ministers, or doctrine. The U.S. Government Mandate tramples all of these rights.
Since the HHS mandate was made final earlier this year, religious leaders and groups throughout the country have been saying that unless the mandate was rescinded, litigation would follow.
Sure enough, they have followed through with their word.
The challenge to the HHS mandate is now moving forward at full tilt in all three branches of the federal government: the Judicial, the Legislative, and with an election later this year, the Executive.
A response from the Department of Justice to the ACLJ lawsuit challenging the mandate is due within days.
While the fight for freedom of conscience is far from over, citizens are making it clear that they will not back down in the face of the HHS edict. George Washington wrote that “the establishment of Civil and Religious Liberty was the Motive that induced me to the field of battle.” And it is a battle that continues to this very day.
As we approach the one year anniversary of the Hobby Lobby decision , where the Supreme Court held that the HHS Mandate violated the religious liberties of business owners, it’s clear that the struggle to vindicate religious freedom and the right to conscience is far from over. Having said that,
Today the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could cripple ObamaCare. The Supreme Court has a critical opportunity to reject IRS regulations that illegally authorize tax subsidies for purchasers of health insurance on federal healthcare exchanges. The ACLJ has filed an amicus...
After his “glib” apology before Congress this week for calling the American people “stupid,” ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber attempted to dodge, duck, dip, dive, and … dodge every substantive question that came his way. He refused to answer even the simplest questions like how much ( millions )
From day one, we have warned that the real danger of Obamacare is not in the 2,700 pages of its text (as bad as they are), but in the hundreds of thousands of pages of rules and regulations that would flow out of that text. This week provides yet another example of that danger, and it is in the...