Current Cases:
Get Email Updates | Already Registered? Login
Logo for Print

ACLJ Calls Appeals Court Decision Upholding National Day of Prayer Victory for our Nation's Heritage & History

First Prayer in Congress Image

(Washington, DC) The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), which represented nearly 70 members of Congress in defending the National Day of Prayer, said today's decision by an appeals court upholding the constitutionality of that presidential proclamation is a victory for our nation's heritage and history.  A federal appeals court today overturned a decision by a federal district court in Wisconsin that declared the National Day of Prayer proclamation unconstitutional.  The ACLJ filed an amicus brief urging the appeals court to overturn the lower court decision.

"We're extremely pleased that the appeals court rejected a flawed decision and determined that while some may disagree with a presidential proclamation, they do not have the right to silence the speech they don't agree with," said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ. "The appeals court correctly concluded that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the National Day of Prayer. This decision represents a victory for our nation's heritage and history - protecting a long-standing tradition that's been a part of our country for centuries."
 
In a decision issued today by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the Court's Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook rejected an argument by the Freedom From Religion Foundation that they could bring a federal lawsuit because the National Day of Prayer made them feel excluded and unwelcome.  Echoing an argument made by the ACLJ in its amicus brief, the court concluded: "Hurt feelings differ from legal injury," and all plaintiffs ultimately allege is "disagreement with the President's action."  The decision is posted here.

Additionally, the ACLJ brief contended that there are key Supreme Court decisions that point to the constitutionality of this day of prayer.  The ACLJ cited the 1983 decision in Marsh v. Chambers by the Supreme Court.  The brief argued:  "The historical record establishes that the National Day of Prayer 'is deeply embedded in the history and tradition of this country.' 463 U.S. at 786.  If calls for national prayer did not violate the Establishment Clause during the founding era, Marsh requires the conclusion that the National Day of Prayer is constitutional today."

The ACLJ represented 67 members of the 111th Congress (Republican and Democrat) - including Rep. Randy Forbes of Virginia, who worked with the ACLJ to line-up Congressional support, and who serves as co-chairman of the Congressional Prayer Caucus.

Here's a list of the 67 members of Congress represented in the brief:

United States Senators and Representatives, Randy Forbes, Senator Sam Brownback, Senator James Inhofe, Senator Mike Johanns, Senator Roger Wicker, Robert Aderholt, Todd Akin, Rodney Alexander, Michelle Bachmann, Spencer Bachus, Gresham Barrett, Roscoe Bartlett, Rob Bishop, Marsha Blackburn, John Boehner, John Boozman, Kevin Brady, Paul Broun, Eric Cantor, Michael Conoway, Geoff Davis, Lincoln Davis, Mary Fallin, John Fleming, Jeff Fortenberry, Virginia Foxx, Trent Franks, Scott Garrett, Phil Gingrey, Louie Gohmert, Gregg Harper, Wally Herger, Pete Hoekstra, Bob Inglis, Walter Jones, Jim Jordan, Steve King, John Kline, Doug Lamborn, Robert Latta, Donald Manzullo, Kevin McCarthy, Michael McCaul, Thaddeus McCotter, Patrick McHenry, Mike McIntyre, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Gary Miller, Jeff Miller, Jerry Moran, Sue Myrick, Randy Neugebauer, Pete Olson, Mike Pence, Joe Pitts, Ted Poe, Tom Price, Phil Roe, Jean Schmidt, Heath Shuler, Adrian Smith, Lamar Smith, Glenn Thompson, Todd Tiahrt, Lynn Westmoreland, Joe Wilson, and Frank Wolf.

The ACLJ also represented the ACLJ's Committee to Protect the National Day of Prayer, which consists of concerned Americans who support the day of prayer.   You can read the ACLJ amicus brief here.

Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses on constitutional law and is based in Washington, D.C.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL UPDATES

Connect with ACLJ ACLJ Facebook ACLJ Twitter ACLJ YouTube
Connect with Jay Sekulow Jay Sekulow Jay Sekulow Facebook Jay Sekulow Twitter Jay Sekulow YouTube
Connect with Jordan Sekulow Jordan Sekulow Jordan Sekulow Show Facebook Jordan Sekulow Twitter