Search  |  Login  |  Register

Bipartisan Senate Res. to Support Israel

By Nathanael Bennett1362179685000

Israel has long been one of our nation’s closest – and most important – allies.  It is our relationship with Israel that serves as the foundation of our foreign policy in the most volatile region of the world – the Middle East.  Israel has consistently and steadfastly stood with the United States, and has often done so when virtually none its neighbors have joined them.  It is a relationship that the U.S. can ill afford to lose. 

Fortunately, our alliance with Israel has also been something that the vast majority of both Democrats and Republicans have supported.  In an environment where our two political parties agree on very little, support for Israel has run deep within both parties.

That is why it has been so troubling to observe the current Administration adopt a much more combative posture toward Israel.  Over the course of the last four years, the strained relationship between the Obama Administration and Israel has served to embolden Israel’s enemies, and give Israel’s leaders reason to doubt the strength of their alliance with the United States.  This is particularly problematic as Israel faces a rapidly growing threat from an Iranian regime that is closing in on nuclear capabilities.

Given that the President does not appear to fully appreciate the value of our relationship with Israel, we are extremely grateful that Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) have introduced a resolution specifically spelling out the United States’ commitment to Israel.  Among other things, this resolution states that:

  • the policy of the United States is to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon capability and to take such action as may be necessary to implement this policy, and
  • if the Government of Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense, the United States Government will stand with Israel and provide diplomatic, military, and economic support to the Government of Israel in its defense of its territory, people, and existence.

 It is unfortunate that a resolution like this is even necessary, as the contents of it have long been embraced by a long string of U.S. Presidents from both parties.  It is especially disappointing that we need a resolution like this one at a time when Israel faces so many threats from radical regimes in the region. 

Israel needs the assurance of U.S. support more today than ever before.  With the President failing to provide this assurance, we are hopeful that an overwhelming majority of U.S. Senators will step forward and fill that void by supporting this timely resolution.

Latest in
Israel

67 Borders Won't Be Enough

By David French1418940726059

One of the more ridiculous aspects of the decades-long Middle East “peace process” is the belief that the so-called 1967 borders between Israel and Arab-held territory represent the foundation for a lasting piece. It’s never been true, it’s not true now, and there’s no realistic indication it will...

read more

Sanctions Against Israel?

By David French1418068004913

Late last week, a number of media outlets reported that the Obama Administration may be considering “sanctioning” Israel, an unthinkably destructive act against our closest Middle East ally? But is the report true? American media outlets source their suspicion back to this report , from Haaretz ,

read more

Unlawful Discrimination

By David French1417812757741

Yesterday, the University of California’s student-worker union (UAW Local 2865) voted on whether to join the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. While we don’t yet know the results of the vote, we do know that its supporters have been making deceptive legal arguments...

read more

Taking on Anti-Israel Discrimination

By David French1416865749827

Next week the University of California student-workers union, UAW 2865 (yes, it’s affiliated with United Auto Workers), will vote on its Joint Council’s motion to boycott, divest, and sanction Israeli institutions. This motion is absurd on its face, but if it has any teeth at all it’s also illegal.

read more