Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1307575420000

A multi-year challenge put forth by California atheist Michael Newdow is finally over.  The Supreme Court of the United States has said it will not review a decision by a federal appeals court that upheld the constitutionality of using our national motto - "In God We Trust" - on our nation's coins and currency.

You'll recall this is a legal battle that has spanned many years.  One year ago, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of using the national motto on coins and currency saying the phrase is ceremonial and patriotic and "has nothing whatsoever to do with the establishment of religion."

In fact, the appeals court ruled that Newdow, who brought the challenge, "did not and cannot cite a single Supreme Court case that called into question the mottos constitutionality. . ."  The appeals court also noted that its decision is consistent with other decisions upholding the constitutionality of the National Motto.  You can read the decision here

Were pleased that the judicial system has rejected yet another attempt to re-write history.  In fact, we represented nearly 50 members of Congress in an amicus brief in this legal marathon that dates back to 2006.

"In God We Trust" was first put on U.S. coins in the 1860's and on paper currency in the 1950's.

Here's the good news.  The Supreme Court put an end to this legal challenge, permitting the appeals court decision upholding the constitutionality of the national motto to stand.

We have battled Newdow on this issue and others - including the use of the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Here's the bottom line:  It always has been our position that while the First Amendment affords atheists complete freedom to disbelieve, it does not compel the federal judiciary to redact religious references in every area of public life in order to suit atheistic sensibilities.

Newdow's reaction to being turned down by the Supreme Court is predictable.  He told a reporter he was disappointed and that he would re-file the lawsuit elsewhere.

We will be ready.

 

A Time to Reflect

By Skip Ash1432299600000

Memorial Day is a special day for me for a number of reasons. First, I grew up in a military family, and I served on active duty in the Army for 22 years myself. I know well the sacrifices that men and women in the Armed Forces make every day to defend this Nation. Second, my parents and my...

read more

Reason for Celebration

By Carly F. Gammill1428002231625

We live in a world torn by struggles in which some factions seek power, while others long desperately for peace. This picture of the modern era may appear new because of the weapons used to wage the wars, but it is a condition that has been familiar to men and women for virtually all of human...

read more

Bergdahl & Our Leaders’ Lost Honor

By David French1427467158649

Desertion is a very old story in the history of armies and armed conflict. Soldiers deserted from the Continental Army, from the Union Army, from the American armies in World War I and World War II — yet those armies fought on, fought well, and prevailed. An army can survive desertion, so to hear...

read more

Purple Hearts for Fort Hood Victims

By Jay Sekulow1423243672347

At last, a victory for common sense and fairness. According to Fox News , next week the Army will announce that the victims of Nidal Hasan’s Fort Hood terrorist attack will receive purple hearts. Previously, the Obama Administration had labeled Hasan’s attack an act of “workplace violence,” despite...

read more