Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1317603623000

It is a case that did not get much attention when it was announced.  But, make no mistake about it, this case is going to set the tone for the constitutional debate underway involving immigration and Arizona's right to protect its citizens and borders.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case out of Arizona - a case involving Arizona's landmark 2007 law that penalizes employers for hiring illegal immigrants.  The law punishes companies by suspending or revoking their business licenses for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants. It also requires Arizona employers to use a federal electronic system to verify if an employee is authorized to work.  This law was upheld by the 9th Circuit, but the Department of Justice asked the high court to take this case - to overturn the ruling.

This comes as Arizona's new law - the one recently approved and signed into law - is coming under attack - by the ACLU - and a lawsuit soon-to-be-filed by the Department of Justice.  The new law states that an officer engaged in a lawful stop, detention or arrest shall, when practicable, ask about a person's legal status when reasonable suspicion exists that the person is in the U.S. illegally.

Here's the challenge - the state of Arizona has a constitutional right to act - in the 2007 law and now with the recently approved law, SB 1070.  But the Department of Justice - and others - are challenging Arizona every step of the way. 

This immigration issue is now front-and-center because the high court will hear arguments about the 2007 law next term.  We're standing up with the state of Arizona.  We are going to file an amicus brief with the high court in support of the Arizona law.  And, we will be filing briefs in support of Arizona's new law being challenged aggressively in federal courts.

You can stand with us.  You can make a difference.  We will be representing you in our briefs.  Add you name to the Committee to Protect America's Borders.  It's time to act.  Time to stand up for your rights.  Add your name today.

Latest in
Immigration

Constitution 1, impatient Obama 0

By Jay Sekulow1424204298896

It’s still early in the legal battle over President Obama’s sweeping immigration actions, but so far the score is clear: The Constitution 1, an impatient president, 0. Last night, Federal District Court Judge Andrew Hanen ordered a temporary halt to President Obama’s so-called “Deferred Action for...

read more

Court Halts Obama’s Executive Action

By Jay Sekulow1424192421808

Just before midnight last night, a federal court issued an order temporarily halting President Obama’s illegal Executive action on immigration. The federal court agreed with our amicus brief – on behalf of 68 Members of Congress and over 70,000 Americans – that President Obama’s actions violated...

read more

Congress Must Preserve Constitution

By Jay Sekulow1417534282235

It’s unconstitutional. It’s reckless. It’s lawless. All these things have been said about President Obama’s executive action on immigration—a breathtaking order that not only changes laws passed by Congress, but will likely send millions of mostly low-skill workers flooding into a workplace that is...

read more

Executive Imperialism

By David French1416524300700

If you’ve heard it once, you’ve heard it a thousand times — divided government means “gridlock.” With Congress in the hands of one party and the presidency in the hands of the other, nothing gets done. In fact, there’s an argument that voters see this alleged “gridlock” as a feature of divided...

read more