Search  |  Login  |  Register

Conservative ‘Propaganda’?

By David French1379692715000

This morning’s USA Today story highlighting the latest round of IRS document leaks was particularly intriguing. It begins:

Newly uncovered IRS documents show the agency flagged political groups based on the content of their literature, raising concerns specifically about “anti-Obama rhetoric,” inflammatory language and “emotional” statements made by non-profits seeking tax-exempt status.

The internal 2011 documents, obtained by USA TODAY, list 162 groups by name, with comments by Internal Revenue Service lawyers in Washington raising issues about their political, lobbying and advocacy activities. In 21 cases, those activities were characterized as “propaganda.”

Considering that 33 groups that we represent at the ACLJ (I’m one of the attorneys on our pending lawsuit on behalf of 41 conservative groups) were discussed in the documents, including several accused of spreading “propaganda,” I thought I’d take a quick look at the left-wing world of 501(c)(4) advocacy to see how one of the nation’s largest and most-established (c)(4)’s is avoiding propaganda or “inflammatory” rhetoric.

My first stop? MoveOn.org. Featured prominently on their home page was this non-emotional, non-inflammatory, highly-education appeal to “Skip Ender’s Game: Don’t Give the Bigot a Buck,” including a petition featuring this scholarly text:

“Ender’s Game” author Orson Scott Card is a bigot who wants to see the destruction of LGBT marriage equality and will use his earnings from the movie “Ender’s Game” to oppose gay rights. Pledge to skip “Ender’s Game” and ensure that your entertainment dollars don’t support homophobia.

Next, I discovered that MoveOn members are asking Yelp to drop out of ALEC. Of course, to accomplish this mission, these members dressed in all their Sunday best:

Nothing but “education” going on there, and it’s surely much more elevated discourse than the conservative “general advocacy” or “issue advocacy” or “negative Obama commentary” highlighted by the IRS during its exacting scrutiny of the Tea Party.

I highlight these gems from MoveOn not because MoveOn is doing anything legally wrong – indeed, nothing about these petitions or its anti-Yelp campaign or anything else I could see on its website was inconsistent with robust 501(c)(4) issue advocacy – but instead to highlight the absurdity of the IRS’s obsession with tea-party activism.  

There was nothing new about the alleged “flood” of tea-party applications – other than the conservative movement finally beginning to catch up to the Left. But in today’s partisan IRS, that fact alone was enough to warrant a years-long, unconstitutional campaign of delay, intrusion, and denial.

Latest in
Free Speech

Academic Freedom Under Fire at KU

By David French1418157957737

When it comes to threatening core liberty interests, activists can be nothing if not industrious — sometimes using even well-intentioned laws as sledgehammers against disfavored views and disfavored speakers. Witness the emerging use of state open-records laws to harass dissenting professors. The...

read more

A WH Connection in the IRS Scandal?

By Matthew Clark1417723199238

The IRS scandal just took a turn for the worse, exposing what may be further political abuse by the Obama Administration. It has recently come to light that the Obama Administration’s Treasury Department is in possession of over 2,500 pages of documents that may show that the IRS and the White...

read more

Surprise: 30k “Lost” IRS Emails Found

By Matthew Clark1416860401231

Surprise. Surprise. 30,000 of Lois Lerner’s mysteriously “lost” emails, which the Obama Administration and Democrats in Congress claimed were gone forever, have been found. We knew the Obama Administration’s bizarre claim that the emails were unrecoverable, deleted, not backed up, crashed, and on...

read more

A Move to Preserve Internet Freedom

By Nathanael Bennett1416263498307

Last Spring, we told you about the Obama Administration’s plan to transfer control over key functions of the Internet to a multi-national body . In response, more than 123,000 of you spoke out in opposition to the President’s plan, and in favor of the freedom that has been the hallmark of the...

read more