The Irony of the IRS’s Concern Over Conservative ‘Propaganda’ | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

Conservative ‘Propaganda’?

By David French1379692715000

This morning’s USA Today story highlighting the latest round of IRS document leaks was particularly intriguing. It begins:

Newly uncovered IRS documents show the agency flagged political groups based on the content of their literature, raising concerns specifically about “anti-Obama rhetoric,” inflammatory language and “emotional” statements made by non-profits seeking tax-exempt status.

The internal 2011 documents, obtained by USA TODAY, list 162 groups by name, with comments by Internal Revenue Service lawyers in Washington raising issues about their political, lobbying and advocacy activities. In 21 cases, those activities were characterized as “propaganda.”

Considering that 33 groups that we represent at the ACLJ (I’m one of the attorneys on our pending lawsuit on behalf of 41 conservative groups) were discussed in the documents, including several accused of spreading “propaganda,” I thought I’d take a quick look at the left-wing world of 501(c)(4) advocacy to see how one of the nation’s largest and most-established (c)(4)’s is avoiding propaganda or “inflammatory” rhetoric.

My first stop? MoveOn.org. Featured prominently on their home page was this non-emotional, non-inflammatory, highly-education appeal to “Skip Ender’s Game: Don’t Give the Bigot a Buck,” including a petition featuring this scholarly text:

“Ender’s Game” author Orson Scott Card is a bigot who wants to see the destruction of LGBT marriage equality and will use his earnings from the movie “Ender’s Game” to oppose gay rights. Pledge to skip “Ender’s Game” and ensure that your entertainment dollars don’t support homophobia.

Next, I discovered that MoveOn members are asking Yelp to drop out of ALEC. Of course, to accomplish this mission, these members dressed in all their Sunday best:

Nothing but “education” going on there, and it’s surely much more elevated discourse than the conservative “general advocacy” or “issue advocacy” or “negative Obama commentary” highlighted by the IRS during its exacting scrutiny of the Tea Party.

I highlight these gems from MoveOn not because MoveOn is doing anything legally wrong – indeed, nothing about these petitions or its anti-Yelp campaign or anything else I could see on its website was inconsistent with robust 501(c)(4) issue advocacy – but instead to highlight the absurdity of the IRS’s obsession with tea-party activism.  

There was nothing new about the alleged “flood” of tea-party applications – other than the conservative movement finally beginning to catch up to the Left. But in today’s partisan IRS, that fact alone was enough to warrant a years-long, unconstitutional campaign of delay, intrusion, and denial.

Latest in
Free Speech

Johnson Amendment and Churches’ Freedoms

By Michelle Terry1469544702518

Did you know there’s a little-known amendment that has been restricting the First Amendment rights of churches and faith-based organizations for more than 60 years? After it was mentioned during last week’s Republican National Convention, many people have been discussing this so-called Johnson...

read more

Brexit, Ordinary Voters, and the IRS

By Harry G. Hutchison1467122332057

Several days have passed since British voters upended the status quo favored by experts, elites, and money managers on both sides of the Atlantic. Although trillions of dollars of nominal wealth disappeared within a few hours of the vote, the enduring effects, both political and economic, of this...

read more

D.C. Court Upholds FCC's Net Neutrality

By ACLJ.org1466087532719

A split panel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has upheld the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) 2015 net neutrality order reclassifying broadband and fixed and mobile wireless as a “telecommunications” service under Title II of the Communications Act ( United States Telecom...

read more

IRS Targeting Scandal: We Won't Allow It

By Jay Sekulow1465330627689

It’s a strategy the Obama administration has mastered – the 3-D strategy: Delay, Distract, and Deflect. I cited that strategy in a post last month when a federal judge in Texas labelled the Obama Justice Department “unethical” and “intentionally deceptive” – calling out the biased behavior of...

read more