Search  |  Login  |  Register

Conservative ‘Propaganda’?

By David French1379692715000

This morning’s USA Today story highlighting the latest round of IRS document leaks was particularly intriguing. It begins:

Newly uncovered IRS documents show the agency flagged political groups based on the content of their literature, raising concerns specifically about “anti-Obama rhetoric,” inflammatory language and “emotional” statements made by non-profits seeking tax-exempt status.

The internal 2011 documents, obtained by USA TODAY, list 162 groups by name, with comments by Internal Revenue Service lawyers in Washington raising issues about their political, lobbying and advocacy activities. In 21 cases, those activities were characterized as “propaganda.”

Considering that 33 groups that we represent at the ACLJ (I’m one of the attorneys on our pending lawsuit on behalf of 41 conservative groups) were discussed in the documents, including several accused of spreading “propaganda,” I thought I’d take a quick look at the left-wing world of 501(c)(4) advocacy to see how one of the nation’s largest and most-established (c)(4)’s is avoiding propaganda or “inflammatory” rhetoric.

My first stop? MoveOn.org. Featured prominently on their home page was this non-emotional, non-inflammatory, highly-education appeal to “Skip Ender’s Game: Don’t Give the Bigot a Buck,” including a petition featuring this scholarly text:

“Ender’s Game” author Orson Scott Card is a bigot who wants to see the destruction of LGBT marriage equality and will use his earnings from the movie “Ender’s Game” to oppose gay rights. Pledge to skip “Ender’s Game” and ensure that your entertainment dollars don’t support homophobia.

Next, I discovered that MoveOn members are asking Yelp to drop out of ALEC. Of course, to accomplish this mission, these members dressed in all their Sunday best:

Nothing but “education” going on there, and it’s surely much more elevated discourse than the conservative “general advocacy” or “issue advocacy” or “negative Obama commentary” highlighted by the IRS during its exacting scrutiny of the Tea Party.

I highlight these gems from MoveOn not because MoveOn is doing anything legally wrong – indeed, nothing about these petitions or its anti-Yelp campaign or anything else I could see on its website was inconsistent with robust 501(c)(4) issue advocacy – but instead to highlight the absurdity of the IRS’s obsession with tea-party activism.  

There was nothing new about the alleged “flood” of tea-party applications – other than the conservative movement finally beginning to catch up to the Left. But in today’s partisan IRS, that fact alone was enough to warrant a years-long, unconstitutional campaign of delay, intrusion, and denial.

Latest in
Free Speech

County to Interrogate Teens Over Faith

By Matthew Clark1421264952394

A school board in Virginia is considering the repeal of a policy that would have forced 14-year-old minors to stand before the school board to be interrogated about their religious beliefs. The Goochland County policy is aimed at homeschool families that fall under Virginia’s decades-old religious...

read more

House Report Confirms IRS “Bias”

By Jay Sekulow1419356716682

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has released a scathing interim report detailing extreme political “bias” throughout the ranks of the IRS that led to it targeting conservative groups in response to the anti-conservative group rhetoric “being openly and loudly espoused by the...

read more

IRS (Finally) Approves 2 More Groups

By ACLJ.org1419273797845

After years of needless delays, the IRS has finally approved two more targeted conservative groups. Late last week the IRS relented and informed us that it has agreed to approve the tax-exempt status of the North East Tarrant Tea Party and Myrtle Beach Tea Party, as 501(c)(4) organizations. North...

read more

Academic Freedom Under Fire at KU

By David French1418157957737

When it comes to threatening core liberty interests, activists can be nothing if not industrious — sometimes using even well-intentioned laws as sledgehammers against disfavored views and disfavored speakers. Witness the emerging use of state open-records laws to harass dissenting professors. The...

read more