Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1308957951000

Today the Supreme Court of the United States has an important opportunity to protect free speech by removing the blackout periods prior to primary and general elections that prohibit issue advertising.


The Supreme Court should restore the ability of organizations to speak out on key issues in the days leading up to an election by removing a ban on advertising.  The issue that is front and center is free speech.  By banning issue advertisements by grassroots lobbying organizations in the days leading up to an election, there is a significant bias in place putting these organizations at a distinct disadvantage in speaking out on the cultural and political issues that matter most.  The McCain-Feingold provisions established speech free zones.  Its time for the Supreme Court to end this censorship and declare these speech free zones unconstitutional.

 

The Court is hearing oral arguments in the consolidated cases of  FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life (No. 06-969) and McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life (No. 06-970).  We filed an amicus brief with the high court on behalf of itself and Focus on the Family, a non-profit religious corporation committed to strengthening the family.  In our brief, we urged the high court to remove the prohibition of grassroots lobbying organizations from taking part in issue advertising 30-days before a primary election and 60-days before a general election.

 

The brief asserts:  Because the business of governing continues, the business of the People, that is, the business of giving instructions to their elected representatives continues.  And, likewise, the business of seeking redress of grievances continues.  When Congress enacted the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, it acted in derogation of these facts and to the detriment of the right of the people to petition for a redress of grievances through the use of genuine issue advertisements by grassroots lobbying organizations.  The right to petition is fundamental, and warrants this Courts close guardianship.

 

The Supreme Court will issue its opinion in the case before the end of the term this summer.

 

Latest in
Free Speech

County to Interrogate Teens Over Faith

By Matthew Clark1421264952394

A school board in Virginia is considering the repeal of a policy that would have forced 14-year-old minors to stand before the school board to be interrogated about their religious beliefs. The Goochland County policy is aimed at homeschool families that fall under Virginia’s decades-old religious...

read more

House Report Confirms IRS “Bias”

By Jay Sekulow1419356716682

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has released a scathing interim report detailing extreme political “bias” throughout the ranks of the IRS that led to it targeting conservative groups in response to the anti-conservative group rhetoric “being openly and loudly espoused by the...

read more

IRS (Finally) Approves 2 More Groups

By ACLJ.org1419273797845

After years of needless delays, the IRS has finally approved two more targeted conservative groups. Late last week the IRS relented and informed us that it has agreed to approve the tax-exempt status of the North East Tarrant Tea Party and Myrtle Beach Tea Party, as 501(c)(4) organizations. North...

read more

Academic Freedom Under Fire at KU

By David French1418157957737

When it comes to threatening core liberty interests, activists can be nothing if not industrious — sometimes using even well-intentioned laws as sledgehammers against disfavored views and disfavored speakers. Witness the emerging use of state open-records laws to harass dissenting professors. The...

read more