Did the New York Times Just Stumble Across an IRS Motive for Targeting the Tea Party? | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

Motive for Targeting the Tea Party?

By Matthew Clark1404832587000

The New York Times editorial board may have just stumbled across an ulterior motive for the IRS targeting of the Tea Party.

In its latest liberal rant coming to the aid of the IRS – that poor defenseless government leviathan – it repeats the same tired leftist talking points about the root of all the IRS’s problems being that it doesn’t have enough money.

Yet in doing so, it may have just stumbled across a new motive behind the targeting, good old-fashioned revenge.

He’s what the New York Times calls the “real scandal”:

There is a scandal going on at the Internal Revenue Service, but it has nothing to do with Lois Lerner or her missing emails. . . .

No, the real scandal is what Republicans did to cripple the agency when virtually no one was looking. Since the broad Tea Party-driven spending cuts of 2010, the agency’s budget has been cut by 14 percent after inflation is considered, leading to sharply reduced staff, less enforcement of the tax laws and poor taxpayer service. (Emphasis added.)

So according to the New York Times, the targeting of the Tea Party, which the IRS admitted was wrong and for which it faux-apologized, is a direct result of “the broad Tea Party-driven spending cuts of 2010.”

The Tea Party forced cuts to the IRS budget, and the IRS retaliated by shutting down the Tea Party.  Is that it?

How revenge is any better than political retribution, I’m not sure.

Then again, maybe it’s not revenge; maybe it’s extortion.  As the NY Times concludes, if Congress will give the IRS more money then the IRS will agree to “do its job of collecting the money,” presumably instead of targeting conservatives.

Regardless as to whether it was revenge, retaliation, or extortion, the fact remains that the IRS targeting of conservative groups was wrong.  The Obama Administration and its political allies in the mainstream media protest too much.

Their persistent petulance and constantly changing excuses in the face of mounting, damning evidence belies their true intentions.  They were caught red-handed weaponizing the IRS against their political opponents.  They have franticly searched for a scapegoat (rogue low-level employees in Cincinnati, mismanagement, computer crashes, underfunding, Congress, etc.), but the truth has always stood in the way of their misdirection.

And it will continue to do so.  The American people demand accountability.  And if we at the ACLJ have anything to do with it (which we do through our lawsuit on behalf of 41 targeted groups from 22 states), we’ll see to it that they get it.

This article is crossposted on Red State.

Latest in
Free Speech

Johnson Amendment and Churches’ Freedoms

By Michelle Terry1469544702518

Did you know there’s a little-known amendment that has been restricting the First Amendment rights of churches and faith-based organizations for more than 60 years? After it was mentioned during last week’s Republican National Convention, many people have been discussing this so-called Johnson...

read more

Brexit, Ordinary Voters, and the IRS

By Harry G. Hutchison1467122332057

Several days have passed since British voters upended the status quo favored by experts, elites, and money managers on both sides of the Atlantic. Although trillions of dollars of nominal wealth disappeared within a few hours of the vote, the enduring effects, both political and economic, of this...

read more

D.C. Court Upholds FCC's Net Neutrality

By ACLJ.org1466087532719

A split panel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has upheld the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) 2015 net neutrality order reclassifying broadband and fixed and mobile wireless as a “telecommunications” service under Title II of the Communications Act ( United States Telecom...

read more

IRS Targeting Scandal: We Won't Allow It

By Jay Sekulow1465330627689

It’s a strategy the Obama administration has mastered – the 3-D strategy: Delay, Distract, and Deflect. I cited that strategy in a post last month when a federal judge in Texas labelled the Obama Justice Department “unethical” and “intentionally deceptive” – calling out the biased behavior of...

read more