ACLJ Victories on Christmas, Student Speech, and Church Zoning
As you know, we receive many contacts at the ACLJ requests for assistance in protecting your religious and constitutional rights. I want to share with you some recent victories where the ACLJ made a difference on a wide variety of issues.
In
We wrote a letter explaining that various Supreme Court cases and guidelines from the U.S. Department of Education make it clear that student artwork, reading materials, and assignments that include religious expression must be assessed on the basis of neutral academic criteria. After the family shared our letter with school officials, they changed their mind and permitted the students card to be submitted with Christmas included.
I want to share another school-related issue that was resolved successfully. This case was in
Once again, we clearly spelled out the law in a letter that explained that prohibiting students from distributing religious tracts during non-instructional time violates the First Amendment. School officials made the correct decision and permitted the student to resume handing out his tracts. The mother contacted us and wrote: We shared with many at our church that the ACLJ had drafted the letter and what you had done for us. I think it opened some eyes to the help that is available through your work and ministry. I know it empowered us as a family. THANK YOU again for all that you have done for us. It was a GREAT comfort and blessing that you were able to help with the letter.
In
The ACLJ sent a letter explaining that the citys zoning code violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution as well as the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). After reviewing our letter, the city amended its zoning code to allow churches to locate in a variety of districts, including the one in which church officials wanted to rent. Were delighted to report that the church is set to hold its first service in the new facility this month.
And, an important victory in Wisconsin where Rachel, a high school student, contacted us after her principal denied approval for a Christian student club because the principal wanted the club to discuss all religions. We sent a letter explaining that denying the clubs right to meet on campus violates both the Equal Access Act and the First Amendment. Rachel reported back to us that school officials cleared the way for the Christian club to operate. Its been approved, Rachel told us. Thank-you again.
These are just a sampling of the many cases we engage at the