Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1321889928000

On Veterans Day, a 13-foot cross was placed on top of a hill at Camp Pendleton in California. The Marines who put it there said they wanted to honor the memory of four comrades killed in Iraq and wanted to show respect for all military personnel who serve abroad. The Marines were actually replacing a cross originally erected in 2003, but that subsequently burned down in 2007. The four Marines honored helped raise the original cross in 2003.

Staff Sgt. Justin Rettenberger said the cross is dedicated to the memory of four Marines killed in battle. "We wanted them all to know that they’ll always be in our hearts, that they’ll never be forgotten," he said. "All great warriors."

It did not take long before opposition surfaced. That's right. The Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers (MAAF) said the cross is unconstitutional. In a blog post, the MAAF said "we still have continuing exploitation of military service and veterans to promote Christian privilege." The placement of the cross, the MAAF contends, "sends a message of exclusion rather than inclusion on this secular holiday."

Ridiculous.

The Constitution does not prohibit honoring fallen troops through the use of a historic symbol merely because that symbol also carries religious significance. In fact, the Constitution forbids excluding religion from every aspect of public life, precisely the goal of the MAAF and other atheist groups.

This latest flap comes just weeks after another atheist group, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF), targeted for removal a war memorial - a statue of Jesus - placed on a Montana mountain nearly 60 years ago.

In the Camp Pendleton case, we have sent a letter to the Commanding Officer explaining in detail that crosses are used as a widespread and universal symbol of remembrance and do not violate the Establishment Clause. "Given the memorial's history and context, it is clear that it is not intended to proselytize for any faith," the letter states. "It is meant to honor and commemorate the sacrifice of those who have given the ultimate sacrifice."

In urging the Marines to keep the cross in place, our letter clearly puts this symbol into the proper perspective: "Crosses are an apt, appropriate, and constitutionally permissible means of honoring and commemorating the sacrifice of those who have given their life for their comrades and their country."

The outcry from the MAAF now has the Marines taking another look. A Marine spokesperson told ChristianPost.com that "Camp Pendleton legal authorities are researching and reviewing the issue in order to make a judicious decision."

We are hopeful the Marines won't be swayed by this atheist group and its flawed view of the Constitution. We urge the Marines to keep the cross in place. The display is not only appropriate, it is constitutional as well.

Victory: Ground Zero Cross

By Jay Sekulow1406561623000

In a decision that represents a ringing affirmation of the presence of faith in the life of our nation, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected the American Atheists’ challenge to including the famed “Ground Zero Cross” in the National September 11 Museum. While the entire opinion is worth...

read more

Claims Against the Ground Zero Cross

By Matthew Clark1404744954000

From day one, angry atheists have made outlandish claims about the Ground Zero Cross – the two intersecting steel beams in the shape of a cross that was found in the wreckage of the World Trade Center following 9/11. Not only have they made these absurd claims in public (calling it “ offensive and...

read more

This Memorial Day, Honor our Heroes

By Jay Sekulow1400870024000

The men and women of our armed forces deserve our gratitude. They have fought, sacrificed, and died for the freedoms we hold dear. At the ACLJ, we spend every day fighting to defend our First Freedoms, our freedom of speech and of religion. Yet this work wouldn’t even be possible if it were not for...

read more

Challenge to “Under God” in the Pledge

By CeCe Heil1399997460000

In the latest chapter of a seemingly never ending battle over the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court unanimously rejected a challenge to the daily voluntary recitation of the Pledge in Massachusetts schools. The ACLJ filed an amicus brief...

read more