Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1312237921000

It now appears we have less than two weeks to file our amicus brief backing the cross at the new Ground Zero museum - a cross being challenged in court by the American Atheists. As I told you last week, when the atheist group filed suit, we will be representing former NYC firefighter and first responder Tim Brown on the friend-of-the-court brief.

We're also going to represent thousands of Americans who stand with us - who want to support the cross - those who sign on to our Committee to Protect the Ground Zero Cross. You can add your name here.

It's our view that this lawsuit is without merit and should be tossed out of court. Consider what's at issue here: A cross formed by two intersecting steel beams that survived the Twin Towers collapse on 9-11.

We've produced a short legal summation of the lawsuit which is posted here. The entire complaint, posted here, makes a ridiculous claim. It claims their plaintiffs are suffering both physical and emotional damages from the existence of the cross. That's right, the mere existence of the cross has brought on headaches, indigestion, even mental pain. And one of the plaintiffs, Jane Everhart, derided the cross as nothing more than "ugly piece of wreckage" that "does not represent anything … but horror and death."

Talk about offensive.

This cross memorial is a part of 9-11 history - a symbol that has deep meaning and serves as a powerful remembrance.

The cross - not just a symbol of our faith, but also a symbol of our freedom.

In addition to the baseless claims made in the lawsuit, the facts are clear: this kind of memorial does not violate the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Most Americans understand this kind of challenge is nothing more than another spoke in the wheel of the anti-God strategy used by these atheists groups. And, most Americans don't want atheists re-writing our Constitution.

We're confident the court will see this suit for exactly what it is - a flawed filing that is a waste of time and a waste of judicial resources. In the end, the court should toss out this lawsuit.

Reason for Celebration

By Carly F. Gammill1428002231625

We live in a world torn by struggles in which some factions seek power, while others long desperately for peace. This picture of the modern era may appear new because of the weapons used to wage the wars, but it is a condition that has been familiar to men and women for virtually all of human...

read more

Bergdahl & Our Leaders’ Lost Honor

By David French1427467158649

Desertion is a very old story in the history of armies and armed conflict. Soldiers deserted from the Continental Army, from the Union Army, from the American armies in World War I and World War II — yet those armies fought on, fought well, and prevailed. An army can survive desertion, so to hear...

read more

Purple Hearts for Fort Hood Victims

By Jay Sekulow1423243672347

At last, a victory for common sense and fairness. According to Fox News , next week the Army will announce that the victims of Nidal Hasan’s Fort Hood terrorist attack will receive purple hearts. Previously, the Obama Administration had labeled Hasan’s attack an act of “workplace violence,” despite...

read more

American Sniper Has Created a Cultural Moment: Here’s Why

By David French1421694905032

At 9:30 p.m. on Saturday night, a packed theater in Franklin, Tenn., was completely quiet. As the credits rolled, some folks were filing out, but many more were standing, still looking at the screen, honoring the man whose life they’d just seen portrayed on the silver screen. Before the movie, I’d...

read more