Remembering Our Rendezvous with Destiny

By 

ACLJ.org

|
October 28, 2015

6 min read

American Heritage

A

A

Yesterday marked the 51st anniversary of one of the most important political speeches ever delivered – Ronald Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” Speech.

Also sometimes referred to as the “Rendezvous with Destiny” speech, it was delivered by Ronald Reagan in 1964, days before the presidential election between President Lyndon Johnson and Barry Goldwater. Part of a pre-recorded television program, the speech launched Ronald Reagan to political stardom, resulting in a campaign to draft him to run for Governor of California which ultimately resulted in eight years in the White House as the 40th President of the United States, one of the most important Presidents in American history.

But the speech is now commemorated as more than just career-launching because so much of it remains increasingly prescient and relevant to our nation and politics today.

So as we find ourselves in the midst of yet another presidential election with debates, stump speeches, and campaign slogans, let us reflect on the lessons from Ronald Reagan and the speech that changed everything. Because it still has a lot to teach us and much to inspire us.

I’d encourage you to watch or listen to the entire speech below. But if you only have time to read several vitally relevant portions of the speech, I’ve pulled them out below.

As for the peace that we would preserve, I wonder who among us would like to approach the wife or mother whose husband or son has died in South Vietnam and ask them if they think this is a peace that should be maintained indefinitely. Do they mean peace, or do they mean we just want to be left in peace? There can be no real peace while one American is dying some place in the world for the rest of us. We're at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars, and it's been said if we lose that war, and in so doing lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening. Well I think it's time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that were intended for us by the Founding Fathers.

Not too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a Cuban refugee, a businessman who had escaped from Castro, and in the midst of his story one of my friends turned to the other and said, "We don't know how lucky we are." And the Cuban stopped and said, "How lucky you are? I had someplace to escape to." And in that sentence he told us the entire story. If we lose freedom here, there's no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth.

And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people, is still the newest and the most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man.

This is the issue of this election: whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.

You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right. Well I'd like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There's only an up or down: [up] man's old -- old-aged dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. And regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course. . . .

Well, I, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and women of this country, as "the masses." This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, "the full power of centralized government" -- this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy.

We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now enslaved behind the Iron Curtain, "Give up your dreams of freedom because to save our own skins, we're willing to make a deal with your slave masters." Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." Now let's set the record straight. There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace -- and you can have it in the next second -- surrender.

Admittedly, there's a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face -- that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. . . .

You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." "There is a point beyond which they must not advance." And this -- this is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said, "The destiny of man is not measured by material computations. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we're spirits -- not animals." And he said, "There's something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty."

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.

We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.

Reagan’s speech should inspire us to seize the opportunities before us.  There are those who think America’s best days are behind us, that we must run away from what has made America great in the past in order to be great in the future.

There are those who refuse to name radical Islamic terrorists as our primary enemy who should be decimated and destroyed instead of merely downgraded and ignored.

But for America to be “the last best hope of man on earth”, it is still time for choosing that which is right – peace through strong leadership around the world and a government that remembers that it is beholden to the sovereign and free people.