Americans Take a Stand: Angry Atheists Back Down | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

ACLJ Profile Completion

Verified

Angry Atheists Back Down

By Matthew Clark1375814366000

After thinly veiled threats and reprehensible rhetoric against the inclusion of the Star of David – a symbol of the Jewish people and the atrocities of the Holocaust – in a Holocaust memorial, the Freedom From Religion Foundation is publicly backing down.

A few weeks ago, FFRF, an angry atheists group with a long record of failed attempts to expunge any relic for our religious heritage from public life, demanded that the state of Ohio scrap its plans to build the first Holocaust memorial on state capitol grounds in the nation.  FFRF insensitively called the inclusion of the Star of David “exclusionary” and a “dishonor”.  Their letter blamed Christianity for the Nazi Holocaust and analogized their own concept of defending the so-call wall of separation between search and state to preventing “a similar holocaust on our shores.”

In response, 39,000 Americans (more than double FFRF’s total membership) signed on to the ACLJ’s letter to the Governor and Attorney General of Ohio defending the Holocaust memorial and the Star of David from these “bizarre” and legally devoid attacks.  The ACLJ offered our legal service should the FFRF choose to file a lawsuit against this clearly constitutional memorial.

Our letter explained how the Star of David was not only a religious symbol of the Jewish religion, but it was a symbol of the Jewish people and the State of Israel.  And even more legally relevant in this situation, the Star of David was the symbol the Nazis forced the Jews to wear as part of the systematic murder of six millions Jews, two-thirds of the Jewish population in Europe.  The Star of David is a fitting and constitutional way to honor their memory.

FFRF quickly backed down.  These angry atheists mellowed, saying they had no plans to file a lawsuit (even claiming they never had plans to sue).  In fact, the atheist group reversed their reprehensible rhetoric, stating, “We have no objection to a Holocaust memorial on public property.”  FFRF still claims to “object” to the Star of David and reserves the right to “speak up.”  However, as one local newspaper noted, “But that is all they will do.”

This is a significant victory for the memory of all those tragically affected by the Holocaust.  It is a victory for reason.  The angry, illogical vehemence of a few was not allowed to drown out reason and constitutionally sound legal arguments.  Taking a stand does make a difference.

This article is crossposted on Red State.

Honoring Those Who Serve on Veterans Day

By Wesley Smith1478796139234

Veterans Day is Friday, November 11th. Formerly known as Armistice Day, this holiday was originally created to commemorate the end of World War I, which officially took place on November 11, 1918. In legislation that was passed in 1938, November 11th was "dedicated to the cause of world peace and...

read more

U.S. Air Force: Anniversary History

By Edward White1473953188196

As a nation, we are fortunate to be protected by the best Air Force in the world, which celebrates the anniversary of its founding on September 18th. The mission of the modern United States Air Force is “to fly, fight, and win in air, space, and cyberspace.” The Air Force has approximately 5,000...

read more

National Motto Faux Pas

By Jordan Sekulow1469804497277

In her acceptance speech tonight, Hillary Clinton stated: Our country's motto is e pluribus unum: out of many, we are one. Will we stay true to that motto? Sound familiar? In 2010, President Obama similarly said , “In the United States, our motto is E pluribus unum — out of many, one.” One problem.

read more

The Battle Over "In God We Trust"

By Laura Hernandez1467831915482

Right before Independence Day weekend, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, in a somewhat unusual move, granted angry atheists, who are challenging the National Motto (“In God We Trust”) on our currency, the right specifically to respond to the arguments made in our amicus...

read more