Medical Technician Fired for Religious Beliefs | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1306153477000

 

Stephanie Adamson was an emergency medical technician (EMT) with Superior Ambulance Service in Chicago, Illinois.  On August 21, 2003, Stephanie and her partner were dispatched to Mt. Sinai Hospital in order to transport a patient to a Chicago clinic where the patient was to have an abortion.  When the dispatch first came through, Stephanie, who is pro-life, was concerned about being asked to participate in a procedure she thought would jeopardize her deeply-held religious and moral convictions.  Stephanie decided to obtain further facts about the situation when she arrived at the hospital.

When Stephanie arrived at the hospital, she saw an ultrasound of the unborn baby and confirmed that the reason for the transport was so the patient could abort her child.  Stephanie also confirmed that the transport did not involve an emergency situation.

Stephanie promptly called into the dispatch office and informed the dispatcher that she could not take this call; that to do so would undermine her pro-life beliefs.  The dispatcher immediately called in another ambulance, which arrived within minutes, and eventually connected Stephanie with her supervisor, Dave Curtis.

Curtis, who understood that Stephanie was refusing to take the call because of her moral convictions, fired Stephanie then and there, without attempting to accommodate Stephanie's beliefs.

Depositions taken of several Superior Ambulance employees have both confirmed and uncovered many important facts: (1) the transport was not an emergency call; (2) Superior Ambulance drivers in the past have requested that calls be assigned to other drivers for far less important reasons; and (3) none of the Superior Ambulance employees who have been deposed recalls ever dispatching, taking, or even hearing of, a call to transport a patient to have an abortion.

The lawsuit contends that Superior Ambulance Services violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act. The suit requests a jury trial and is seeking damages for loss of income and benefits, as well as compensatory and punitive damages.


Latest in
ACLJ

Jay Sekulow Live: #3 Podcast on iTunes

By Jay Sekulow1452029152358

This morning you made something really unique happen. My son Logan had an old friend reach out to him to let him know that, while downloading the latest episode of a popular podcast, he discovered that the Jay Sekulow Live! podcast of our daily radio program is ranked number 3 on iTunes. To our...

read more

Building Upon 2015’s Victories

By Jay Sekulow1451419200000

Thanks to the engagement of ACLJ members supporting our work, signing our petitions, and sharing our important advocacy with friends, we achieved numerous significant victories around the world in 2015. For the past several weeks we’ve been outlining this year’s success in our 2015 Victories Series...

read more

A Season of Thanks

By Jay Sekulow1448463600000

On October 3, 1789, President George Washington issued the first-ever Thanksgiving Proclamation , declaring November 26, 1789 a day of Thanksgiving. While reading the entire declaration (posted below), I couldn’t help but dwell on what I’m thankful for this year. I’m thankful for a growing family...

read more

“Undemocratic” Debuts on NYT

By ACLJ.org1433262160821

ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow’s latest book, “Undemocratic: How Unelected, Unaccountable Bureaucrats are Stealing Your Liberty and Freedom,” has debuted on The New York Times E-Book Nonfiction Best Sellers List at Number 10. Because of your continued help and support, “Undemocratic” joins “Rise of...

read more