Search  |  Login  |  Register

By Jay Sekulow1308676254000

Weve been keeping you posted on the fight for life that is being waged within the national health care legislation.  Unfortunately, there have been some Members of Congress who have tried to play both sides of the issue.  I want to simply lay out the facts about what happened late last Thursday, July 30, 2009 in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, so that there is no confusion about what occurred.

As you know, the Committee spent long days and late nights over the past two weeks considering sweeping health care legislation that, among other problems, would dramatically expand the number of abortions, as well as the number of taxpayer-subsidized abortions.  The ACLJ has been supporting a number of amendments that would help solve this significant problem. 

One of the most important amendments in this effort was offered by Rep. Joe Pitts (R-PA) and Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI).  This amendment would have ensured that no insurance plan (public or private) could be mandated to cover abortion, and that no taxpayer-funded plan could cover abortion.  In a bipartisan vote at approximately 9:34 p.m., this important amendment initially passed 31-27 (the Committee Clerks tally can be viewed here).  This tally included a last minute switch from no to yes by Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA).  This switch was made in order for Chairman Waxman to have the right to request a re-vote later in the evening.  Subsequent events would suggest that the intervening time was used to lobby Members of the Committee to change their vote.

At approximately 11:20 p.m., Chairman Waxman called for another series of votes.  The first vote was a motion to reconsider the previous vote on the Pitts/Stupak Amendment.  With help from the 13-seat advantage held by Democrats, this motion was approved 35-24, with only one Democrat, Rep. Bart Stupak, bold enough to dissent (the Committee Clerks tally can be viewed here).

The approval of Mr. Waxmans motion enabled the reconsideration of the Pitts/Stupak Amendment.  This time, the Amendment failed 29-30 (the Committee Clerks tally can be viewed here).  As you can see from the Committee Clerks documents, there were three changes that allowed this change in outcome to happen:

  1. Chairman Waxman changed his vote from yes to no.  This was no surprise, as the only reason he voted yes in the first place was to be allowed to request a re-vote later in the evening.
  2. Rep. Zack Space (D-OH) did not vote the first time around, but showed up to vote no for the second vote.  His reason for missing the first vote is unclear.
  3. Rep. Bart Gordon switched his vote from yes to no, a move that switched the vote from one of approval to one of rejection.

Rep. Gordon previously had a mixed record on life issues.  It appears that he has tried to have it both ways.  His defense now is that he misunderstood the vote the first time, but has always been pro-choice.  Judging by the tragic outcome that his late-night vote switch last week brought about, I would have to agree that his pro-abortion colors have been plainly revealed.  I am disappointed that it took the defeat of such an important pro-life amendment to bring this to light.  It is my hope that this occasion will cause Rep. Gordon to reassess his position on this most fundamental and critical issue.

Latest in
Pro Life

An Evil Business Model

By Palmer Williams1438121504467

The third video exposing the truth behind Planned Parenthood’s barbaric business practices is more shocking and grotesque than the first two . POLITICO has details: A new undercover video released by opponents of Planned Parenthood has graphic depictions of a technician sorting through the tissue...

read more

The Facts About Planned Parenthood

By Nathanael Bennett1438105338283

Last week, a caller on Jay Sekulow Live! wanted to defend Planned Parenthood. Buying into the lies and distortion from the abortion industry, he asked about the cancer screenings and other health services that Planned Parenthood claims to provide to women. Unfortunately for him, the facts were not...

read more

Defending Pro-Life Speech in NJ

By Erik Zimmerman1438010608354

In the world of real estate, the mantra “Location, Location, Location” sums up the reality that the location of a property is one of the biggest factors that determine its desirability. The same principle applies with equal, if not greater, force when it comes to exercising the freedom of speech,

read more

Is Planned Parenthood’s Abortion and Organ Harvesting Business Lying about Corporate Sponsors Too?

By Matthew Clark1437763127798

Planned Parenthood – the largest abortion provider in America – murders babies. It takes half a billion of our tax dollars . And it harvests and sells baby parts to pad its “bottom line .” But it also may have just been caught lying about a number of corporate sponsors. Until yesterday, Planned...

read more