Reports of Death of Texas Abortion Law Greatly Exaggerated | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

Reports of Death of TX Abortion Law Exaggerated

By Matthew Clark1383267978000

Today, a federal judge ruled that some portions of a Texas pro-life law are unconstitutional – but not the part you're thinking about.

Unsurprisingly, you may see headlines such as this one from the mainstream media: “Federal judge rules controversial Texas abortion law unconstitutional.”

This is just one more example of the abortion distortion playing itself out in the pro-abortion mainstream media.

You may remember a few months back that an angry pro-abortion mob, for a short time, thwarted the will of the people in passing a critical pro-life bill prohibiting abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

The legislature later passed this critical pro-life bill after Governor Perry called a special session to ensure that the will of the people of Texas protecting the lives of unborn babies was upheld.

This portion of the law, the main portion that garnered so much media attention and hate from the Left, was NOT struck down.  In fact, it wasn’t even a part of this particular lawsuit.

In this case, Planned Parenthood and others challenged two other provisions of the Texas abortion law: 1) a provision requiring that abortionists have admitting privileges at local hospitals to ensure that if a medical emergency arose, the abortionist could get the woman and baby to a hospital close by and 2) a provision requiring that when dangerous abortion drugs are administered to a woman that for the woman’s own health the FDA’s own guidelines be followed and the drugs not be administered without a doctor physically present in the room.

The federal district court struck the first requirement as unconstitutional while narrowing the second requirement.  The 20-week abortion ban remains untouched.

Here are the two key portions of the Judge’s ruling.  First, striking the doctor admittance requirement:

The admitting-privileges provision of House Bill 2 does not bear a rational relationship to the legitimate right of the state in preserving and promoting fetal life or a woman's health and, in any event, places a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus and is thus an undue burden to her.

Second, requiring a health and life of the mother exception for the abortion drug limitations – exceptions that if unclarified by a court or the legislature could swallow the rule:

The medication abortion provision may not be enforced against any physician who determines, in appropriate medical judgment, to perform the medication-abortion using off-label protocol for the preservation of the life or health of the mother.

Finally, and maybe most importantly, the court expedited the case, noting, “the final decision will be made by the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals or the U.S. Supreme Court.”

The sad irony of the court’s decision is that provisions of the law that were meant to protect women have now been limited under the auspices of the “health” of the mother.  Just another example of the abortion distortion we battle every day.

Update 10.31.2013:  The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has just granted an emergency stay allowing a critical portion of the pro-life Texas bill to go into effect.  The federal appeals court in a unanimous panel of what happened to be three female judges stated that the state law requiring abortionists to have admittance privileges at local hospitals does not “impose a substantial obstacle to abortions.”

This provision will go into effect as the case continues.  The portion of the lower court’s decision regarding the abortion drug restrictions remains in effect as the case continues. 

Planned Parenthood lamented that this ruling could force it to close up to one-third of its abortion clinics.

All said the vast majority of the pro-life law will go into effect.  This ruling is a major victory for the lives of unborn babies and women in Texas.

Latest in
Pro Life

Looking for the Silver Lining

By Walter M. Weber1467223330083

The Supreme Court's 5-3 decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt , striking down two Texas abortion regulations, was a great disappointment . No question. Assuming the role of Supreme Medical Review Board, the Court took a magnifying glass to scrutinize the Texas regulations for any flaws or...

read more

Supreme Court Puts Women at Risk

By Jay Sekulow1467052217627

It’s the first time in nearly a decade since the Supreme Court has weighed in on the issue of abortion. In Monday’s 5-3 decision, the high court struck down a Texas law that required common-sense safety standards for abortion clinics – regulations designed to protect women. In writing for the...

read more

SCOTUS Puts Profits Over Women’s Health

By Jay Sekulow1467043213457

It’s extremely disappointing. The U.S. Supreme Court today struck down commonsense safety standards for abortion clinics – regulations designed to protect women. The 5-3 decision in the case of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt struck down a Texas law regulating abortion clinics. The Court missed...

read more

Briefs Filed to Expose Illegal Abortions

By ACLJ.org1466102628040

Last summer, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) began to release a series of videos documenting criminal and other illegal acts of abortion providers, medical researchers, and fetal tissue procurement companies after the group spent a few years compiling an extensive collection of videos and...

read more