2012 Victories: 10 Commandments Permitted in Public Park | American Center for Law and Justice
  Search  |  Login  |  Register

10 Commandments Allowed in Public Park

By Matthew Clark1355954638000

This is the latest installment in a year-end series looking back at a few of the hundreds of victories by the ACLJ in 2012.

A religious group called Summum had created for itself a list of rules called the “Seven Aphorisms.” The group demanded that a small city in Utah, Pleasant Grove, prominently display a monument to their “Seven Aphorisms” because the city had accepted a 10 Commandments monument in a public park.

Summum took their demand all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, and three years ago ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow presented oral arguments before the Supreme Court. The high Court unanimously agreed with our argument that the city is not required to accept every display presented to it just because it has accepted one display.

Despite unanimously losing their lawsuit at the Supreme Court, Summum once again tried to challenge the 10 Commandments monument in state court. Summum again essentially argued that the city should be required to accept their “Seven Aphorisms” or be forced to remove all privately donated monuments, including the 10 Commandments. The ACLJ once more successfully defended the 10 Commandments display in city parks, as Summum’s lawsuit was rejected by the court.

To help the ACLJ continue to have the resources we need to make these victories possible and continue these fights, please consider making a tax-deductible donation to the ACLJ through our year-end Matching Challenge. Your gift will be matched dollar-for-dollar though the end of the year.

You can read more in the ACLJ’s 2012 Victories series here.

Defending our Legal Heritage in Court

By Geoffrey Surtees1373646235000

This week was a significant one in the ongoing legal saga of Summum v. Pleasant Grove . As discussed in more detail here , Summum first filed suit against Pleasant Grove in 2005. While its legal theories and tactics have changed over time, Summum’s assertion has always remained the same: because...

read more

The Concluding Chapter Begins

By Geoffrey Surtees1368641662000

Almost eight years ago, in July of 2005, a new age religious group called Summum filed a lawsuit against Pleasant Grove City, Utah. The group claimed that the city’s decision not to display a stone monument bearing Summum’s “Seven Aphorisms” in a city park violated the Free Speech Clause of the...

read more

10 Commandments Win

By Jay Sekulow1340742439000

As you may recall, over three years ago, in Pleasant Grove City v. Summum , the ACLJ obtained a unanimous victory before the United States Supreme Court which allowed the City of Pleasant Grove, Utah to continue to display a donated Ten Commandments monument in a public park alongside other...

read more

Offended Observers Strike Oakland Zoo

By David French1338320790000

Over the holiday weekend I saw that angry activists never rest. In a Saturday letter , an activist claiming to represent “freedom of religious choice” and “equality” wrote the Oakland Zoo demanding that it remove a Ten Commandments display. To describe the letter as “overheated” would be an...

read more